Logo

If everyone hates censorship so much, why do those “censorship-free” alternative social media sites always fail?

Last Updated: 26.06.2025 07:48

If everyone hates censorship so much, why do those “censorship-free” alternative social media sites always fail?

If I let you borrow my bike for free, I have the right to tell you you can’t do certain things with it, and I have the right to take it back. Why? Because it’s my property, not yours.

Child pornographers.

The #1 problem people who make and consume child pornography have is connecting the producers with the buyers. Any “censorship-free” network quickly gets overrun with child porn. Classic example: 8kun.

Meteorite-common amino acid induces formation of nanocavities in clay mineral, hinting at life's origins - Phys.org

You have the right to say what you want. You do not have the right to use other people’s stuff for free.

The #3 user? Terrorists. 8kun was used to plan 3 different school shootings in a 6-month period.

Because you’re confusing two different things.

What are the primary causes of the persistent smog crisis affecting Delhi and other parts of North India?

“Censorship-free” social media sites quickly become Nazi bars where people exchange child porn. Normal human beings don’t hang out in Nazi bars with pedophiles.

Who is the #2 user of completely free digital communications networks that let you say absolutely anything? Who else wants that?

So.

Testosterone heightens men’s sensitivity to social feedback and reshapes self-esteem - PsyPost

That has nothing to do with social media.

Why do “censorship-free” social media networks always fail? Well, let’s see. Sit down and think. Think really, really hard.

If i let you use my computer network for free, I have the right to tell you you can’t do certain things with it, and I have the right to kick you off. Why? Because it’s my property, not yours.

Trump administration, for 1st time, returns wrongly deported migrant to US - ABC News

We don’t have to guess. We know.

I hate censorship. That is, I think the government has no place controlling what people say, read, express, or create, except insofar as is necessary to prevent things like terroristic threats, dissemination of classified information, fraud, false advertising, and so on.

Are you going to stay on a social media site that’s all photos of babies being raped, Nazis posting graphic descriptions of finishing what Hitler started, and plans for school shootings?

Quae illo minus voluptatum fugiat ea quaerat qui.

Now, say you’re an ordinary person. You don’t like child porn. You’re not a Nazi. You don’t want to shoot up a school or blow up the White House.

Nazis.

Who is the #1 user of completely free digital communications networks that let you say absolutely anything? Who most wants that?

Cardiologist warns ‘many sunscreens are loaded with cancer-causing chemicals’: Here’s how to choose safe options - Hindustan Times